Turning Taxes, Tariffs, and VAT Unsustainble actors to Develop Sustainable actions Tools for Gamification (Pass the baton ) to achieve ESG lead success
- Hey HA
- Aug 18
- 8 min read
Updated: 3 days ago
by SIMII
The future executive article , Something that a sustainability leader, minister, or corporate board member could actually read and act on. Active accelerate sustainble sharpened, people-first version
The world has long relied on blunt fiscal tools — taxes, tariffs, and VAT — to raise revenue and protect domestic industries. But what if those same levers were repurposed to tackle the greatest challenge of our time: feeble window success of future sustainability?
The core idea is simple but powerful: make the polluter pay, reward the sustainable, and recycle the money back into green solutions. Instead of tolerating imbalances where high-emitting nations prosper while vulnerable ones foot the climate bill, we redesign fiscal policy to tilt the playing field toward resilience and equity.
The Concept in Plain Terms!
Unsustainable nations (heavy polluters, resource exploiters) face higher levies.
Self-sustainable nations (resilient, low-impact economies) get relief — through lower tariffs, favorable VAT rules, or direct incentives.
The revenue raised is funneled back into green infrastructure, climate adaptation, debt relief, or universal basic income tied to eco-targets.
Think of it as global budget repair — but instead of cutting services or piling debt, governments charge those draining the planet’s future.
How It Could Work
Taxes on DamageCarbon taxes, extraction levies, and pollution fees directly price in environmental harm. Example: Sweden’s carbon tax pushed companies into efficiency while raising funds for clean tech.
Sustainability-Adjusted VATProducts linked to deforestation or high emissions carry a higher VAT; low-impact goods enjoy reduced rates. It’s a subtle but effective way to nudge consumption.
Tariffs with TeethBorder adjustments penalize imports from countries with weak climate policies. The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is already testing this model — protecting its industries while pressuring others to clean up.
Revenue then flows into targeted sustainable actions: renewable subsidies, biodiversity protection, or social programs like UBI linked to eco-performance.
STORY -INHERIT THE ESG GOVERANCE AND SUSTAIN ABILITY
Why It Matters
Economically: Global carbon taxes could generate trillions annually, stabilizing budgets while shifting investment away from stranded fossil assets.
Environmentally: Polluters face rising costs, while sustainable practices get a competitive edge.
Socially: The richest emitters owe the most. Redirecting revenue toward low-income, low-emission nations answers the fairness question that has dogged climate negotiations for decades.
But Let’s Be Honest…
This won’t be easy.
Trade wars are a real risk if tariffs are weaponized.
Definitions matter: Who decides what’s “unsustainable”? The UN? WTO? A new climate court?
Wealthy nations will resist footing a bill they’ve dodged for generations.
Self-sustainable economies might feel double-penalized if frameworks are sloppy.
Still, the alternative — carrying on with business as usual — guarantees deeper deficits, more displacement, and a narrowing window for climate stability.
Where We’re Already Seeing It
The EU CBAM (Carbon Border Tax) is the clearest precedent.
Carbon taxes in Canada, Sweden, and South Africa prove the model works domestically.
Global wealth tax proposals suggest redirecting billionaire windfalls toward climate and poverty relief — a cousin idea with strong public support.
These are not fringe theories anymore. They are the early prototypes of a fiscal system built for survival.
Next Step: Training the Leaders Who’ll Use These Tools
It’s one thing to design fiscal mechanisms; it’s another to equip future leaders to use them wisely. That’s where gamified learning platforms come in — think of simulations where players manage nations, apply carbon tariffs, negotiate climate deals, and face the consequences of short-termism versus sustainability.
This isn’t abstract. Programs like KPMG’s ESG training and serious games in universities are already proving how gamification boosts retention and sparks creative solutions. Coupling real fiscal reforms with leadership training is how we create a self-reinforcing cycle: unsustainable behavior funds sustainable education, which in turn builds leaders who dismantle the old system.
Bottom Line
The fiscal architecture of the 20th century was built for growth at any cost. The architecture of the 21st must be built for survival with fairness.
Taxes, tariffs, and VAT are not relics — they’re levers. Pull them differently, and they stop protecting yesterday’s industries and start underwriting tomorrow’s stability.
The question isn’t whether we can afford to do this. It’s whether we can afford not to.
Public sustainable sectors or Private unsustainable sectors. Lucky all theere’s a straight-talking, executive-grade comparison that can drop into a brief, deck, or policy note. Its kept it concrete, action-oriented, and built for 2025 realities.
ESG NATIONAL SUCCESS HUBS
ESG in National Governance vs. Non-Sustainable Practices in Private & Public Sectors
ESG is not a slogan; it’s a control system for risk, capital, and legitimacy. National governments that wire ESG into law, money, and data change market behavior at scale. Private and public actors that ignore it externalize costs, inflate systemic risk, and burn trust.
Pillar 1 — Environmental (Climate, Resources, Pollution)
Aspect | ESG-Aligned National Governance | Non-Sustainable Private Sectors | Non-Sustainable Public Sectors |
Policy Instruments | Carbon pricing, emissions caps/ETS, nature-positive planning, mandatory TCFD/ISSB reporting, CBAM-style border adjustments, phase-out schedules for coal & ICE vehicles. | Lobbying against rules; delay tactics; offset-without-abatement; land-use shortcuts; “efficient” but extractive processes; limited scope 3 transparency. | Subsidized fossil assets, outdated fuel standards, weak EIA enforcement, politicized exemptions, chronic underpricing of water and waste. |
Capital & Incentives | Green taxonomies for disclosure/alignment; public green banks; concessional debt for clean infra; differential VAT for low-carbon goods; green public procurement >30% of spend. | Capex concentrated in legacy assets; short payback bias; ESG seen as “cost center”; share buybacks over transition investment. | Budget inertia; capex trapped in sunk assets; donor-driven project selection with weak maintenance. |
Data & Verification | National GHG registries; digital MRV (satellite + utility data); product-level footprints for trade; deforestation-free import rules. | Selective lifecycle assessment; supplier opacity; marketing-led “eco” claims; limited third-party assurance. | Fragmented inventories; manual reporting; limited monitoring of protected areas and water quality. |
Enforcement | Administrative penalties, market delisting, procurement bans, border taxes, director liability, bond covenants tied to ESG KPIs. | “Cost of doing business” fines; legal appeals; settle without structural change. | Political interference, irregular inspections, amnesty cycles, weak judiciary throughput. |
Outcomes (medium term) | Emissions intensity falls; resource efficiency improves; green jobs rise; sovereign spreads benefit from climate credibility. | Stranded assets risk; insurance premiums rise; supply-chain shocks; consumer exit; higher cost of capital. | Infrastructure failures; pollution hotspots; rising health burden; fiscal stress from disasters. |
Pillar 2 — Social (Equity, Labor, Community)
Aspect | ESG-Aligned National Governance | Non-Sustainable Private Sectors | Non-Sustainable Public Sectors |
Labor & Inclusion | ILO-aligned labor laws; minimum standards for gig work; pay-equity reporting; modern slavery acts; free, prior, informed consent (FPIC) for indigenous lands. | Precarious contracts; misclassification; weak supplier audits; wage theft in lower tiers; performative DEI. | Patronage hiring; union suppression; poor OHS compliance; opaque grievance redress. |
Public Services & Access | Universal access targets (health, water, energy); social tariffs for vulnerable groups; just transition funds for affected workers. | Price discrimination; access limited to premium segments; aggressive IP enforcement restricting access (e.g., medicines). | Uneven service quality; leakage and losses; urban bias; unfunded mandates at local levels. |
Community Impact | Social impact assessments linked to permits; benefit-sharing agreements; resettlement standards; open consultations. | License-to-operate crises; protests; land conflicts; episodic philanthropy not tied to core impacts. | Top-down project siting; weak compensation; politicized relocations. |
Metrics & Disclosure | Gender pay gap, injury rates, living-wage coverage, service access KPIs; demographic representation in public boards. | Narrow HR metrics; low transparency beyond Tier-1 suppliers; selective incident reporting. | Paper compliance; lagging HRIS; irregular publication of staffing and safety data. |
Outcomes (medium term) | Higher participation & productivity; fewer strikes; better health outcomes; social license strengthens. | Talent attrition, lawsuits, boycotts; recruitment premiums; brand erosion. | Low trust; periodic unrest; “brain drain” from public service. |
Pillar 3 — Governance (Ethics, Transparency, Accountability)
Aspect | ESG-Aligned National Governance | Non-Sustainable Private Sectors | Non-Sustainable Public Sectors |
Rules & Standards | Mandatory sustainability reporting (e.g., ISSB/EU-style), beneficial-ownership registries, procurement transparency, competition/anti-trust aligned with net-zero. | Weak boards; dual-class entrenchment; opaque tax planning; related-party transactions; greenwashing. | Regulatory capture; off-budget vehicles; opaque SOE governance; audit backlogs. |
Risk & Controls | Whole-of-government risk registers (climate, nature, social), cyber/data protection, whistleblower laws, political finance transparency. | CFO/CSO misalignment; ESG siloed from ERM; crisis PR over root-cause fix. | Siloed ministries; conflict-of-interest unmanaged; weak internal audit independence. |
Capital Market Signals | Sovereign sustainability-linked bonds; prudential rules factoring climate risk in banks/insurers; stewardship codes for asset owners. | Minimal ESG in executive comp; short-term EPS targets; limited assurance over non-financial KPIs. | State banks financing brown projects; pension funds underweight transition assets. |
Outcomes (medium term) | Lower corruption exposure; tighter spreads; stable FDI; predictable rule of law. | Enforcement actions; delistings; higher WACC; reputational damage. | Procurement overruns; fiscal leakages; declining service quality; citizen distrust. |
Cross-Cutting: What “Good” Looks Like in 2025 (Non-Negotiables)
Law, not logos: Voluntary ESG is table stakes; mandatory disclosure + penalties move markets.
Money talks: Budget lines, tax codes, tariffs, and procurement rules must codify ESG—not just strategies.
Digitize MRV: If it can’t be measured automatically (utility feeds, satellite, IoT, customs data), it won’t be managed.
Scope 3 or it didn’t happen: Real climate plans include supply chains and product use, not just headquarters.
Just transition: Protect workers and communities during phase-outs; otherwise, you lose the politics and the policy.
KPI Scorecard (ready to adopt)
Domain | KPI | Governance Target | Red Flag |
Climate | GHG intensity (tCO₂e/GDP or /revenue) | ↓ 7–10% YoY | Flat or rising 2 years |
Nature | Deforestation-linked imports (% of total) | 0% by 2028 | >2% after 2026 |
Energy | Fossil share in power mix | <20% by 2030 | >35% in 2028 |
Water | Non-revenue water (utilities) | <20% | >35% |
Labor | Living-wage coverage (%) | 100% core ops; 80% Tier-1 | <60% |
Safety | TRIR (per 200k hours) | Top quartile sector | Bottom half sector |
Equity | Gender pay gap (median) | ≤3% | ≥8% |
Governance | Beneficial ownership disclosed | 100% suppliers >$1m | <70% |
Finance | % procurement with ESG clauses | ≥60% by value | <25% |
Assurance | Non-financial data externally assured | ≥Limited for all KPIs; Reasonable for climate | No assurance |
(Targets are pragmatic ranges—tighten for advanced markets, stage for emerging.)
Implementation Playbook
For Governments (12–24 months)
Legislate disclosure aligned with ISSB; require scope 1–3 for large entities.
Price externalities: carbon tax/ETS; landfill/waste levies; water abstraction pricing.
Procurement muscle: ESG contract clauses with performance bonds; supplier scorecards; debarment lists.
Finance the transition: green banks, blended finance, sovereign SLBs with step-ups for missed targets.
Border integrity: CBAM-style rules; product-level footprints via digital product passports.
MRV stack: national data lake (GHG, land-use, utilities, customs) + third-party assurance.
Just transition funds: worker reskilling, place-based investment, social protection.
For Corporates & SOEs (next 4 quarters)
Tie executive pay to validated ESG KPIs (20–30% weight).
Build a real scope-3 plan with supplier contracts, not pledges.
Shift capex: ≥50% to transition and efficiency within 3 years.
Adopt internal carbon price for all investment cases.
Move procurement to living-wage and deforestation-free requirements.
Get limited/then reasonable assurance on non-financials.
Publish just transition plans for affected assets/workforces.
Risk Radar (call it early)
Greenhushing: Silence ≠ safety; investors treat it as risk.
Policy whiplash: Lock in with bonds, contracts, and phase-out schedules that survive elections.
Supply-chain denial: Audits without remediation will backfire; fund supplier upgrades.
Litigation: Climate, labor, and consumer-protection lawsuits are now mainstream portfolio risk.
Data theater: Dashboards without action invite regulatory heat; prioritize 10 “hard” KPIs over 100 vanity metrics.
Fast Wins (next 90 days)
Government: Add ESG clauses and data reporting to all new tenders >$10m; publish supplier debarment criteria; announce internal carbon price for public projects.
Corporate/SOE: Freeze new long-lived brown capex; set an internal carbon price; convert top 50 suppliers to contractually binding ESG KPIs; commission third-party assurance for climate data.
Both: Stand up a joint ESG Data Room (utilities, customs, land-use layers) to triangulate scope 3 and deforestation risk.
Optional Add-On: Training That Actually Works
Deploy a gamified, data-driven simulation (think “SustainQuest”) where officials and managers must balance budgets, tariffs, carbon prices, and social backlash. Tie progression to real KPIs (e.g., reducing import risk, improving water loss). Fund it from environmental levies—pollution finances the fix, and you build leaders who won’t backslide.
References
OECD (2022). Environmental Taxation: A Guide for Policy Makers. OECD Publishing, Paris.https://www.oecd.org/environment/tools-evaluation/environmentaltaxation.htm
World Bank (2023). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank.https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org
European Commission (2023). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Brussels.https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
United Nations (2021). The Polluter Pays Principle: From Principle to Practice. UN Environment Programme.https://www.unep.org/resources/polluter-pays-principle
IMF (2022). Fiscal Policies for a Low-Carbon Economy. International Monetary Fund Staff Discussion Note.
Comments